Skip to content

Running commentary · living document · revised 16 October 2026

DMA

Regulation (EU) 2022/1925 on contestable and fair markets in the digital sector, the Digital Markets Act. Whom it designates as gatekeepers, what obligations it imposes on them, how it is enforced and a note on each of its 54 articles and the Annex, with the full text. The full article-by-article commentary is in Czech.

TL;DR

The DMA imposes predefined obligations on a handful of the largest digital undertakings designated by the Commission as gatekeepers. Designation requires a significant impact on the internal market, a core platform service that is an important gateway for business users to reach end users and an entrenched and durable position, or one that it will foreseeably enjoy in the near future. The presumption is triggered by thresholds of EUR 7.5 billion turnover or EUR 75 billion market capitalisation and 45 million monthly end users and 10 000 yearly business users. Gatekeepers may not combine personal data without consent, prevent steering of customers off their service or favour their own services in ranking, and must enable interoperability, data portability and third-party apps. The Commission is the sole enforcer, with fines of up to 10% of worldwide turnover and up to 20% for repeated infringements. Seven gatekeepers with 23 services are designated.

What the Regulation is about

The DMA is ex ante regulation. It lays down rules of conduct that gatekeepers apply themselves and whose observance they must demonstrate, without examining effects on a defined market as competition law does. It protects a legal interest different from competition rules, the contestability and fairness of markets where gatekeepers are present, and applies alongside them.

The obligations sit in three articles. Article 5 applies without further specification, Articles 6 and 7 may be specified by the Commission in an implementing specification decision. The gatekeeper reports on compliance, informs the Commission of concentrations, has its consumer profiling techniques audited and sets up an independent compliance function. The rules may not be circumvented by splitting services or by interface design.

By 10 October 2026 the Commission had adopted four non-compliance decisions with fines totalling EUR 1.59 billion and four specification decisions, and it is running a market investigation into cloud computing services. The first review in April 2026 concluded that the Regulation should not be amended at this stage. Together with the Digital Services Act, the DMA forms what the Commission calls the twin pillars of the EU digital rulebook.

Key parameters

15 Dec 2020

Commission proposal COM(2020) 842 final, together with the proposal for the Digital Services Act.

14 Sep 2022

Adoption of the Regulation, published in the Official Journal on 12 October 2022 (OJ L 265, p. 1).

1 Nov 2022

Entry into force. From this date Article 3(6) and (7) and Articles 40 and 46 to 50 apply (Article 54).

2 May 2023

General application. Undertakings meeting the thresholds had two months to notify the Commission.

5 Sep 2023

The Commission designated six gatekeepers (Alphabet, Amazon, Apple, ByteDance, Meta, Microsoft) and 22 core platform services. The obligations apply from 7 March 2024.

13 May 2024

Designation of Booking as the seventh gatekeeper.

23 Apr 2025

First non-compliance decisions: Apple EUR 500 million for steering rules in the App Store, Meta EUR 200 million for the “consent or pay” model.

28 Apr 2026

First review report: the Regulation is not to be amended at this stage.

23 Jul 2026

Non-compliance decisions against Alphabet: EUR 460 million for self-preferencing in Google Search and EUR 430 million for steering rules in Google Play.

fines

At most 10% of total worldwide turnover, 20% for repeated infringements, 1% for procedural breaches, periodic penalty payments of at most 5% of average daily turnover (Articles 30 and 31).

Case law in a nutshell

General Court decisions interpreting the DMA, one sentence each, with links to the primary sources. The Czech commentary works them into the individual articles with paragraph references.

  • T-1077/23 R Bytedance (9 February 2024): the President of the General Court refused to suspend the designation of TikTok, because urgency was not shown. The public overview under Article 15(3) may also omit confidential information other than business secrets.
  • T-1077/23 Bytedance (17 July 2024): the designation of TikTok upheld. The General Court interpreted the criteria of Article 3, the standard for rebutting the presumptions and the right to be heard also for designation decisions (appeal C-627/24 P).
  • T-1078/23 Meta (3 June 2026): the designation of Messenger upheld, the Annex has the same legal force as the Regulation. The designation of Marketplace annulled because the Commission relied only on data for the three financial years before designation (appeal C-909/26 P).
  • T-1079/23, T-1080/23 and T-214/24 Apple (8 July 2026): actions dismissed. The five App Store storefronts form a single core platform service, and the plea of illegality against Article 6(7) cannot be raised against a designation decision, only against decisions implementing that obligation.
  • T-357/24 Opera (2 September 2026): a competitor may challenge a decision not to designate a service, but the action against the non-designation of the Edge browser failed.

Notes on the provisions

All 54 articles by chapter and section and the Annex, each with a short note. Inside is the full English text from the Official Journal. The full commentary with marginal numbers, examples, case law and open questions is available in Czech on the Czech version of this page.

Chapter I · Art. 1–2

Subject matter, scope and definitions

What the Regulation protects, whom it covers and the ten categories of core platform services. This is where it is decided whether a service can fall under the gatekeeper rules at all.

Art. 1 Subject matter and scope

The aim is contestable and fair markets in the digital sector where gatekeepers are present. The Regulation protects a different legal interest from competition rules, is without prejudice to them, and Member States may not impose further obligations on gatekeepers for the same purpose.

Art. 2 Definitions

The definitions on which the whole Regulation rests: ten categories of core platform services, from online intermediation services and search engines to web browsers, cloud computing services and online advertising services, and the notions of end user and business user.

Chapter II · Art. 3–4

Gatekeepers

Three qualitative criteria, quantitative thresholds that trigger a presumption, notification, rebuttal of the presumption and regular review of the designation.

Art. 3 Designation of gatekeepers

Designation of gatekeepers. Three qualitative criteria, a presumption once the thresholds of EUR 7.5 billion turnover or EUR 75 billion market capitalisation and 45 million monthly end users and 10 000 yearly business users are met, notification within two months and an exceptional rebuttal.

Art. 4 Review of the status of gatekeeper

The Commission may amend a designation decision where the facts on which it was based change substantially, and reviews at least every three years whether gatekeepers still meet the requirements.

Chapter III · Art. 5–15

Practices of gatekeepers that limit contestability or are unfair

The core of the Regulation. The obligations in Article 5 apply without further specification, those in Articles 6 and 7 may be specified by the Commission in a regulatory dialogue. Compliance, reporting, anti-circumvention, information on concentrations and the profiling audit follow.

Obligations (Art. 5–7)

Art. 5 Obligations for gatekeepers

Obligations without further specification: no combining personal data without consent, no parity clauses, freedom to steer customers off the service, access to content purchased elsewhere, no obstacles to raising issues with authorities, no imposed payment or identification services, no tying of registrations and price transparency in advertising.

Art. 6 Obligations for gatekeepers susceptible of being further specified under Article 8

Obligations that the Commission may specify: no use of non-public business user data, un-installation and choice screens, third-party apps and app stores, no self-preferencing in ranking, interoperability, portability and data access, search data and fair conditions of access.

Art. 7 Obligation for gatekeepers on interoperability of number-independent interpersonal communications services

Interoperability of basic functionalities of number-independent interpersonal communications services with third-party providers on the basis of a reference offer, phased in from messages between two users (following the listing in the designation decision) through group messaging (within two years of designation) to voice and video calls (within four years).

Compliance, suspension, exemptions and further obligations (Art. 8–15)

Art. 8 Compliance with obligations for gatekeepers

The gatekeeper must ensure and demonstrate compliance. The Commission may specify by implementing decision the measures needed to comply with Articles 6 and 7. By 10 October 2026 it had adopted four specification decisions: two on interoperability at Apple and two addressed to Alphabet, on interoperability of Android with AI assistants and on sharing Google search data.

Art. 9 Suspension

Suspension of a specific obligation in exceptional circumstances beyond the gatekeeper’s control that endanger the economic viability of its operation in the Union. The Commission has not granted one so far.

Art. 10 Exemption for grounds of public health and public security

Exemption from a specific obligation on grounds of public health or public security, reviewed every year.

Art. 11 Reporting

A report on the compliance measures within six months of designation, updated at least annually, and a non-confidential summary for the public.

Art. 12 Updating obligations for gatekeepers

Updating of obligations by delegated act after a market investigation under Article 19, within expressly defined areas.

Art. 13 Anti-circumvention

Anti-circumvention: artificial segmentation of services to avoid the thresholds, behaviour that undermines compliance including interface design, and degrading conditions for users who exercise their rights under the Regulation.

Art. 14 Obligation to inform about concentrations

The gatekeeper informs the Commission in advance of intended concentrations in the digital sector. The information also allows Member States to request a referral of the concentration to the Commission.

Art. 15 Obligation of an audit

An independently audited description of consumer profiling techniques, which the Commission passes to the European Data Protection Board, and a public overview updated at least annually.

Chapter IV · Art. 16–19

Market investigation

Market investigations for designating gatekeepers, for systematic non-compliance and for new services and new practices.

Art. 16 Opening of a market investigation

Opening of a market investigation by Commission decision and the possibility to ask national authorities for assistance.

Art. 17 Market investigation for designating gatekeepers

Market investigation for designating an undertaking that does not meet the thresholds, or for assessing the rebuttal of one that does. The Commission used it for iMessage, Bing, Edge and iPadOS, for example.

Art. 18 Market investigation into systematic non-compliance

Market investigation into systematic non-compliance after three non-compliance decisions within eight years, with behavioural or structural remedies and a temporary ban on concentrations.

Art. 19 Market investigation into new services and new practices

Market investigation into new services and new practices, which may lead to additions to the list of core platform services or to the obligations. The first one, into cloud computing services, was opened on 18 November 2025.

Chapter V · Art. 20–43

Investigative, enforcement and monitoring powers

The Commission as the sole enforcer of the Regulation: investigative powers, interim measures and commitments, non-compliance decisions, fines and periodic penalty payments, procedural safeguards and cooperation with national authorities and courts.

Proceedings and investigative powers (Art. 20–25)

Art. 20 Opening of proceedings

Opening of proceedings by Commission decision, the precondition for non-compliance decisions, systematic non-compliance investigations and other decisions.

Art. 21 Requests for information

Requests for information by simple request or by decision, including access to data and algorithms and explanations of them. Incorrect, incomplete or misleading information may be fined.

Art. 22 Power to carry out interviews and take statements

Interviews with the consent of the person concerned and recording of their statements.

Art. 23 Powers to conduct inspections

Inspections at the premises of undertakings on the basis of an authorisation or a Commission decision, with the assistance of national authorities and, where needed, the police.

Art. 24 Interim measures

Interim measures in cases of urgency on the basis of a prima facie finding of an infringement and a risk of serious and irreparable damage, only in non-compliance proceedings. The Commission has not adopted any so far.

Art. 25 Commitments

Commitments offered by the gatekeeper in systematic non-compliance proceedings under Article 18, which the Commission may make binding by implementing act.

Monitoring, information from third parties and the compliance function (Art. 26–28)

Art. 26 Monitoring of obligations and measures

Monitoring of obligations and decisions, including retention orders and the appointment of external experts and auditors.

Art. 27 Information by third parties

Anyone may inform the Commission or a national competition authority about a gatekeeper’s practices, but there is no right to have the information acted upon.

Art. 28 Compliance function

A compliance function independent of operational functions, with sufficient authority, stature and resources, whose head reports to the management body and cannot be removed without its consent.

Non-compliance, fines and periodic penalty payments (Art. 29–31)

Art. 29 Non-compliance

Non-compliance decisions ordering the gatekeeper to cease the non-compliance. Four by 10 October 2026: Meta and Apple in April 2025, Alphabet for Google Search and Google Play in July 2026.

Art. 30 Fines

Fines of up to 10 % of total worldwide turnover, up to 20 % for repeated infringements and up to 1 % for procedural breaches. The Commission has imposed EUR 1.59 billion in total: Apple 500 million, Meta 200 million, Alphabet 460 and 430 million.

Art. 31 Periodic penalty payments

Periodic penalty payments of up to 5 % of average daily worldwide turnover for each day, to compel compliance with a decision. The Commission may reduce the definitive amount.

Limitation periods and the right to be heard (Art. 32–34)

Art. 32 Limitation periods for the imposition of penalties

The power to impose fines and periodic penalty payments is subject to a five-year limitation period, interrupted by Commission action, with an outer limit of ten years extended by the duration of court proceedings.

Art. 33 Limitation periods for the enforcement of penalties

The power to enforce fines and periodic penalty payments is subject to a five-year limitation period from the day the decision becomes final.

Art. 34 Right to be heard and access to the file

The right to comment on preliminary findings within at least 14 days and access to the file. The General Court also recognised it for designation decisions that the list does not mention.

Annual reports, professional secrecy, cooperation and other instruments (Art. 35–43)

Art. 35 Annual reporting

Annual reports by the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council on the implementation of the Regulation. Three so far, for 2023, 2024 and 2025.

Art. 36 Professional secrecy

Purpose limitation for information gathered and a prohibition on disclosing information covered by professional secrecy, including by auditors and experts.

Art. 37 Cooperation with national authorities

Close cooperation between the Commission and the Member States and their authorities for coherent enforcement of the instruments applicable to gatekeepers.

Art. 38 Cooperation and coordination with national competent authorities enforcing competition rules

Cooperation with national competition authorities in the European Competition Network, information duties for their investigations and the possibility to investigate non-compliance with Articles 5 to 7 where national law allows.

Art. 39 Cooperation with national courts

Cooperation with national courts: information and opinions from the Commission, its observations to the court and a ban on rulings that run counter to a Commission decision.

Art. 40 The high-level group

A high-level group of European regulatory bodies and networks that advises the Commission, in particular on interactions with other sector-specific rules.

Art. 41 Request for a market investigation

Requests by Member States for market investigations. One Member State suffices for systematic non-compliance, three are needed otherwise. The Commission assesses the request within four months.

Art. 42 Representative actions

Directive (EU) 2020/1828 applies to representative actions against infringements that harm the collective interests of consumers. In Czechia, the Act on collective civil proceedings.

Art. 43 Reporting of breaches and protection of reporting persons

Directive (EU) 2019/1937 applies to the reporting of infringements of the Regulation and the protection of reporting persons. In Czechia, Act No. 171/2023 Coll. on the protection of whistleblowers.

Chapter VI · Art. 44–54

Final provisions

Publication of decisions, review of penalties by the Court of Justice, implementing acts, guidelines and standards, delegated powers, the committee, amendments to two directives, review of the Regulation and application.

Art. 44 Publication of decisions

Publication of decisions with the names of the parties and the main content, including penalties, having regard to confidential information.

Art. 45 Review by the Court of Justice

Unlimited jurisdiction of the Court of Justice of the European Union to review decisions imposing fines or periodic penalty payments, which it may cancel, reduce or increase.

Art. 46 Implementing provisions

Implementing acts on procedures under the Regulation. The Commission adopted Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/814.

Art. 47 Guidelines

Commission guidelines on any aspect of the Regulation. They are not an authoritative finding of compliance. Joint guidelines with the European Data Protection Board are in preparation.

Art. 48 Standardisation

The Commission may mandate European standardisation bodies to develop standards that facilitate compliance with the obligations.

Art. 49 Exercise of the delegation

Exercise of the delegation, conferred on the Commission for five years from 1 November 2022 with tacit extension.

Art. 50 Committee procedure

The Digital Markets Advisory Committee and the advisory procedure, the examination procedure only for the implementing act on cooperation with national authorities.

Art. 51 Amendment to Directive (EU) 2019/1937

Adds the Regulation to the Annex to Directive (EU) 2019/1937 on whistleblower protection.

Art. 52 Amendment to Directive (EU) 2020/1828

Adds the Regulation to Annex I to Directive (EU) 2020/1828 on representative actions.

Art. 53 Review

Review of the Regulation by 3 May 2026 and every three years thereafter. The Commission completed the first review on 28 April 2026, concluding that no amendment is needed at this stage.

Art. 54 Entry into force and application

Entry into force on 1 November 2022, general application from 2 May 2023, selected provisions from 1 November 2022 and Articles 42 and 43 from 25 June 2023.

Annex

Annex

Methodology for identifying and calculating active end users and active business users. According to the General Court it has the same legal force as the Regulation and also decides what counts as a separate core platform service.

Annex Methodology for identifying and calculating active users

Methodology for identifying and calculating active end users and active business users for each category of core platform services, rules for delineating separate services and specific definitions for ten categories.

Sources

How content is made

Content is produced in the Legal To Code legal workflow for Claude Code (version 1.177.0). Cited provisions are verified against a local library of their verbatim wording. Where the wording is not in the library, it is verified in the Czech Collection of Laws. For case-law research the workflow is connected to the Salvia MCP server. Automated checks of citations and internal consistency are part of the workflow. Verify decisive information against the original sources.

How this works · What has changed